// SOLUTIONS
Veyra is deliberately not for everyone. This page describes the situations where it genuinely helps, the industries where it fits best, and the cases where you should spend your money on something else.
Most teams arrive at application security through one of six doors.
The product works, customers depend on it, and nobody has ever looked at it adversarially. You need to know what is actually exposed before someone else finds out for you.
An enterprise prospect wants evidence of vulnerability management and secure development. Deals are waiting on answers you cannot currently give.
Technical diligence will look at security. Arriving with a clean, evidenced posture is materially better than explaining why nobody has checked.
A close call, a report from a customer, or a genuine incident. You need to know whether the same class of problem exists elsewhere.
Three tools producing four hundred alerts, no ranking, no context, and a team that has learned to ignore all of it.
The team doubled, services multiplied, and the informal review process that worked at six engineers stopped working at twenty.
The common thread: multi-tenant software, customer authentication, valuable data, and a small engineering team carrying more responsibility than headcount.
Software built for one industry, holding operational and commercial data its customers cannot run without. Multi-tenant authorization is usually the highest-risk surface.
Tenant, landlord, and payment data in one platform, frequently with third-party integrations into payment and screening providers that widen the trust boundary.
High-volume public endpoints, customer personal data, and payment flows — a large unauthenticated surface by design.
Large user bases, user-generated content, role hierarchies, and permission models that grow more complicated with every feature.
API-heavy products integrating with carriers, warehouses, and customer systems, where a single over-permissive route can expose an entire client relationship.
Merchant data, order history, and payment adjacency, usually with an admin surface that is far more powerful than it looks.
Customer-facing portals where one client seeing another client’s data is not just a bug but a contractual and reputational event.
Teams delivering applications for clients who increasingly ask what security testing was performed before handover.
Message content, contact records, and integration tokens — a concentration of sensitive data that makes a small platform a high-value target.
Veyra works with smaller financial technology providers where the regulatory position permits it. If you operate under a regime with specific testing, residency, or auditor requirements, raise it during scoping. We will tell you plainly whether Veyra can meet those requirements today, and where it cannot.
Selling security to a company that does not need it yet is a bad outcome for both of us.
Not sure which side you are on? Tell us what you run and we will say honestly
An honest comparison, including where the alternative is genuinely the better choice.
| Option | Strength | Limitation | Typical cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual penetration test | Skilled humans finding business logic flaws automation misses. | Point-in-time. Out of date as soon as you ship again. | $15,000–30,000 per engagement |
| Point scanners (SAST/SCA) | Cheap, fast, good at their one category. | No correlation, no API or external context, high volume without ranking. | $25–60 per developer per month |
| Enterprise security platform | Deep and broad capability. | Assumes you employ people to configure, tune, and interpret it. | Five to six figures annually |
| Hiring an AppSec engineer | Context, judgement, and ownership. | Cost, and a long hiring process for a scarce skill set. | $180,000–250,000 fully loaded |
| Veyra | Continuous, correlated, prioritized, with human verification on what matters. | Not a penetration test, not a certification, weaker on domain-specific business logic. | $299–1,499+ per month |
If you can afford both, run Veyra continuously and a penetration test annually. Continuous analysis catches the classes that appear every time you ship; a skilled tester catches the ones that require understanding what your product means. If you can only afford one and you ship weekly, continuous coverage protects you on more days of the year.
A short conversation, or a baseline assessment that tells you exactly what is exposed today.