Normalize
Findings from every analysis source are converted into one schema, mapped to the asset, route, and code location they belong to.
// VEYRA INTELLIGENCE
Scanners produce findings. Attackers produce paths. Veyra Intelligence connects the signals from every other system to identify the combinations that would actually cause you a bad week.
Individually: four medium findings in a backlog of two hundred, each easy to defer.
Correlated: one critical finding with a clear business consequence, and an obvious reason to fix it this week.
Veyra maintains a graph of your environment and looks for paths through it. The graph is what allows a set of individually minor issues to be recognized as a serious one.
Findings from every analysis source are converted into one schema, mapped to the asset, route, and code location they belong to.
The same underlying issue reported by three different techniques becomes one finding, not three tickets your team closes as duplicates.
Related weaknesses are connected across code, APIs, dependencies, and external assets to identify paths from entry point to impact.
AI assisted reasoning traces data flows, interprets authorization patterns, and explains what the combination means in business terms.
Confidence and severity are scored separately, so a high-impact issue Veyra is unsure about is never presented as a confirmed vulnerability.
Findings are ranked by real risk — exploitability, privilege required, data sensitivity, blast radius — not by scanner category.
Conflating the two is how security tools lose credibility. A critical-severity finding at 40% confidence is a lead to investigate. The same finding at 96% confidence, verified, is an incident to fix today.
| Confidence | What it means | How it is presented |
|---|---|---|
| 90–100% | Corroborated by multiple independent signals, and reproduced where safe to do so. | Presented as a confirmed finding, eligible for verified status. |
| 70–89% | Strong evidence from code and context, without safe reproduction available. | Presented as a probable finding with the evidence shown. |
| 50–69% | Pattern matches a known weakness, but context is incomplete. | Presented as requiring investigation, with the ambiguity stated. |
| Below 50% | Insufficient evidence. | Not raised as a finding. Retained as signal for future correlation. |
Authorize your assets and receive a prioritized view of what is actually exposed.